For a couple of minutes Tuesday, reporters peppered Dodgers basic supervisor Brandon Gomes with questions on free agent Shohei Ohtani. Everybody knew the membership not too long ago met with the two-way celebrity. Supervisor Dave Roberts disclosed it, with some element, earlier within the day on the Gaylord Opryland, to the shock of nearly everybody within the business.
However Gomes refused to have interaction on the subject. He repeatedly evaded confirming the assembly. He refused to say something about Ohtani. Gomes, after all, wasn’t required to. He doesn’t need to share what he doesn’t wish to. However when requested why he selected that route after Roberts had disclosed the event, he supplied a distinct cause.
“As a result of,” Gomes mentioned, “we’re not allowed to speak about present free brokers.”
It’s a cause a number of entrance workplace executives and managers have cited when requested about Ohtani in current weeks. It’s additionally not true.
If groups weren’t allowed to debate free brokers, Roberts would have put the Dodgers in line for potential punishment for breaking guidelines. However he didn’t.
The principles that stipulate what groups are allowed to publicly say about free brokers are in Attachment 49, on pages 329 by means of 331, of the collective bargaining settlement. Nowhere does it say that groups are prohibited from discussing free brokers with the media. There are, nonetheless, limitations.
Events can’t remark “concerning the worth of an unsigned free agent, or about doable or contemplated phrases for an unsigned free agent, no matter whether or not discussions have occurred.” In different phrases, events can’t focus on specifics a few participant’s market or a doable deal both on or off the report.
Examples of prohibited feedback are listed.
“Participant X received’t obtain something longer than a one-year deal.”
“Participant X is in search of greater than Participant Y acquired.”
“We’re out on Participant X.”
“We have now considerations about Participant X’s bodily situation.”
Concerned events — gamers, brokers, membership officers — are allowed to “reply to a Media Report of the existence or phrases of a Contract Provide” successfully by declining to remark, confirming it or denying it.
However groups are allowed to remark a few free agent and so they’re allowed to disclose {that a} assembly with one occurred. Roberts didn’t break any guidelines. He stayed away from what was mentioned within the assembly and what the Dodgers are prepared to supply Ohtani.
On Wednesday, Angels basic supervisor Perry Miniasian additionally refused to debate Ohtani. When requested if he was not allowed to, he declined to disclose particulars.
“Everyone does issues completely different,” Miniasian mentioned. “Organizations do issues completely different. So I’m not — I’m staying away from that [question].”
Dodgers president of baseball operations Andrew Friedman mentioned Wednesday he was “all the time going to be unable to debate free-agent gamers” as a result of he needs to keep away from any likelihood of being accused of negatively affecting a participant’s market. He was later requested if MLB’s guidelines on the matter make sense to him.
“I really feel prefer it’s clear, however that doesn’t imply I’m proper,” Friedman mentioned. “In my head it’s clear. So far as whether or not I perceive it or not, I do from the gamers affiliation standpoint. Clearly, if groups are saying they’re in on a free-agent participant, that’s useful.
“But when they’re saying they’re out, that’s clearly not useful in any respect. And in case you are confirming that you’re in on some guys and never on others, you’ll be able to infer that these groups aren’t in. And simply the results that may have on the open free market, I believe, is what they’re making an attempt to keep away from with that. And I perceive that.”
That’s truthful. Why threat upsetting a free agent, particularly a celebrity like Ohtani? He and his camp have made it clear they don’t need the method to play out publicly. Groups even have been warned to not present media leaks, in accordance with stories. The potential draw back is ample. However a rule utterly barring groups from publicly discussing a free agent doesn’t exist.